locked
Re: Asheville Division
daveroberts10@...
Thanks for the reply
|
|
locked
Re: Asheville Division
Carl Ardrey
Railroad Retirement Board. All the divisional records are long gone.
CEA
|
|
locked
Asheville Division
daveroberts10@...
Looking for any source of information related to G A Jones Freight Agent/Clerk Asheville Division 1909 to early 60’s.
|
|
locked
1985 Freight Train Schedules and Blocking Instructions
John
I recently worked with the owner of the movingthefreight.com website to post a copy of the 2/85 Freight Train Schedules and Blocking Instructions from my collection. It is a total of 369 pages in PDF format and includes all manifest freights and unit coal trains. For purists, it's after the NS merger but still in the traditional Southern Railway schedule and blocking format. The big changes would come in 1988 when NS went to a common train numbering format for both the N&W and SOU.
You may access it at the link below. https://movingthefreight.com/railroads/southern/ John
|
|
locked
PRR (Attempted?) Charges for Through Passenger Cars at Washington
George Eichelberger
In 1958, the PRR's financial condition was bad and getting worse. On January 10, 1958 the PRR President sent a letter to the Presidents all of the railroads with through passenger car connections at Washington Union Terminal informing them PRR would asses a $20 per car charge for every car. Every connecting line wrote back with an emphatic "NO". Undaunted, the PRR followed up with the attached letter dated Feb 5, 1958. Although there are quite a few letters and attachments in the SRHA Archives on the subject, none found so far are clear if/how long the charge "stuck".
The second attachment is one of several inb the file describing the number of cars to and from the Southern. Other attachments break the cars down to individual Southern schedules connecting to PRR trains at DC. As with many (!) subjects, the archives contain a rich source of information on many topics. Attachments or letters on one subject provide information on others, Southern through train activity at WUT in this example. It's impossible to say when we will be able to open the archives to work sessions again but when we can, this is the kind of material SRHA members will be able to access, research and hopefully describe in articles for TIES. Ike
|
|
locked
Re: Three days a week beyond Atlanta to New Orleans
Bill Schafer
Steve:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You’re right that trains 1 & 2’s schedule changed from daily to New Orleans in the August 12, 1970 timetable, to tri-weekly in the November 20, 1970 timetable between Birmingham and New Orleans; the trains still ran daily between Atlanta and Birmingham. Effective with the June 1, 1975 timetable, trains 1 & 2 became tri-weekly south of Atlanta. —Bill
|
|
locked
Three days a week beyond Atlanta to New Orleans
Steve Ellis
One of my most poignant memories from my childhood was, right after high school, I took a trip from where I grew up in New Brunswick Canada to Atlanta. I had dreamed about going to Georgia for years, and this was finally my chance. I rode the Southern Railway from Washington to Atlanta on October 9 to October 10, 1970. I know for sure that, on that day, the train did not terminate in Atlanta. At that time, I did not know the country nearly as well as I do now, but I was very excited to be going to the south on the train. I was looking at everybody’s hat check, and I saw some abbreviations that I initially did not understand. I had just assumed the train terminated in Atlanta. Finally I figured out the train went to Birmingham and New Orleans. I can’t remember exactly the abbreviations, but New Orleans may have been simply NO instead of the current N0L. The train arrived on time in Atlanta which was I think at 8:55 AM. I have a schedule from the Southern Railway System dated November 20, 1970. The schedule states that the train only continued beyond Atlanta on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays. This must have started sometime between October 10 and November 20 of this year, 1970. (?)Steve Ellis, Brooklyn, New York
On Sep 10, 2020, at 10:36 AM, Steve Ellis via groups.io <meadowbrookdairy@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
Robert Hanson
Mitchell Street.
Forsyth Street runs parallel to the railroad.
Mitchell crosses it on the Mitchell Street Viaduct.
Bob Hanson
Loganville, GA
-----Original Message-----
From: C J Wyatt <cjwyatt@...> To: main@SouthernRailway.groups.io <main@SouthernRailway.groups.io> Sent: Sat, Oct 10, 2020 11:59 am Subject: Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables Close enough!
Jack On Saturday, October 10, 2020, 11:57:35 AM EDT, John Stewart <jstew@...> wrote: Hi again folks On retrospect, I don't think it was the Mitchell Street viaduct... Maybe Forsyth St. Only been 46 years... John Stewart Birmingham, AL
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
C J Wyatt
Close enough!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jack
On Saturday, October 10, 2020, 11:57:35 AM EDT, John Stewart <jstew@...> wrote:
Hi again folks On retrospect, I don't think it was the Mitchell Street viaduct... Maybe Forsyth St. Only been 46 years... John Stewart Birmingham, AL
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
Hi again folks
On retrospect, I don't think it was the Mitchell Street viaduct... Maybe Forsyth St. Only been 46 years... John Stewart Birmingham, AL
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
Hi folks
Wonderful map! My first engineering assignment in 1974 was to look at an over height boxcar wedged under Mitchell st viaduct, am evaluate damage to the old bridge. John Stewart Birmingham, AL
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
Steve Ellis
Thank you very much, Jack. I appreciate the information.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Oct 9, 2020, at 1:26 AM, C J Wyatt <cjwyatt@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
Robert Hanson
I believe the address was 85 Spring Street.
The Southern Railway office buildings were at 99 and 125 Spring Street. The Southern (or Norfolk Southern) built an additional building at 185 Spring in the 1980's, I think.
The Richard B. Russell Federal Office Building occupies the site of Atlanta Terminal Station today.
Bob Hanson
Loganville, GA
-----Original Message-----
From: C J Wyatt <cjwyatt@...> To: main@SouthernRailway.groups.io <main@SouthernRailway.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Oct 9, 2020 1:25 am Subject: Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables Steve,
Atlanta Terminal Station was on Spring Street, just up from then Southern offices in Atlanta. Attached is a map from the 1934 study. Hope this helps. Jack Wyatt On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, 11:14:17 AM EDT, Steve Ellis via groups.io <meadowbrookdairy=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: Where was the Atlanta terminal station located? Was it on Peachtree Street? Steve Ellis Brooklyn NY
|
|
locked
Atlanta Terminal, was Re: [SouthernRailway] Turntables
C J Wyatt
Steve,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Atlanta Terminal Station was on Spring Street, just up from then Southern offices in Atlanta. Attached is a map from the 1934 study. Hope this helps. Jack Wyatt
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, 11:14:17 AM EDT, Steve Ellis via groups.io <meadowbrookdairy@...> wrote:
Where was the Atlanta terminal station located? Was it on Peachtree Street? Steve Ellis Brooklyn NY
|
|
locked
Southern Passenger Trains at WUT
George Eichelberger
All:
Here is a cross posting from the Passenger Car LIst. It is a good example of the kind of material found in the Southern Railway Presidents' Files collection in the SRHA Archives. Ike From the SRHA Archives..... The Southern Railway Presidents' files are full of correspondence about various interline proposals, plans and conflicts. Few generated as many pieces of angry correspondence as the following letter from PRR President James M. Symes sent January 10, 1958. In it, the PRR announces it intends to bill all roads that interchange passenger cars at Washington $20.00 per car. Research has not turned up how long the PRR attempted, or ever began to levy the charge. The response letters from every railroad President this was addressed to were negative, to say the least. Can anyone fill us in on if the fee was ever charged? The exercise did yield a report by the Pennsy of July 30, 1958, that describes the typical consist of every connecting train at WUT in the fall and winter of 1958-59. It is too long to post but it would make a fine candidate for a "From the Archives" item in SRHA's "TIES" and other historical group magazines. (An oddity....coaches with head rest covers were noted.) Ike
|
|
locked
Re: Jim Crow in Alabama
Matt Bumgarner
:My personal opinion is that some items are great as "teasers" which can inspire interest in the subject matter. But when it comes to meat and potatoes, I agree with Rick, one should be a member of the organization. How one differentiates between a teaser and meat/taters, I leave to your discretion. You have done a very good job of it. Matt Bumgarner
|
|
locked
Re: Jim Crow in Alabama
rwbrv4
These items are historically priceless. I feel that if I have enough interest to request items then I should be a member of the organization. The benefits of being a member is getting the "history" in the quarterly Ties magazine, as well as what comes from the archives. I know someone living in Washington state can't make it to Archive work sessions, but can support the organization in other ways.
Just my opinion.
Rick
|
|
locked
Re: original passenger car color
William L Vanderburg
In 1916, Charlie Soderstrom joined UPS and selected brown for their uniforms and delivery vehicles. He chose a hue of brown that was similar to “the color used on Pullman rail cars because the color reflected class, elegance, and professionalism – and dirt is less visible on brown uniforms and vehicles,” according to UPS. By 1929 the UPS brown color that you see today was adopted across the company.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:48 PM Matt Bumgarner <tarheelpress@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: original passenger car color
Aidrian Bridgeman-Sutton
Jack Pullman ( or "Brewster") Green came into use in February 1900;.The old Pullman colour was indeed a dark brown - UPS brown is officially described as "Pullman Brown" so that gives you an idea of the colour. t Pullman Brown was one of the standard shades offered by paint suppliers and by ACF among others and was used by other roads. Paint charts of the 1900s included chips for both "Old Pullman Color" and "New Pullman Color" . Lettering may not be your only challenge, though it's worth noting the use of gold leaf and/or gold transfers for first class cars was a very widespread practice. In the 1890s and early 1900s cars were also often liberally decorated with scrollwork and ornate designs in the corners and very often everywhere else including the trucks and visible parts of the underframe.Things settled down a bit with the changing taste for slightly simpler lines in 1900s, but even some of the simplified schemes must have taken days to apply While I dont think there is anything specifically Southern available, there are some good photos of cars with these patterns in the Delaware archives Jackson and Sharp collection Aidrian
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 7:57 PM C J Wyatt <cjwyatt@...> wrote: I assumed that the Southern Railway System's first passenger car color was similar to Pullman Green. Indeed, in a contract dated May 3, 1895 with Pullman Palace Car Company for new passenger cars, the body color is specified as "Pullman Standard furnished by Sherwin Williams Co". However the "standard" may be something else. Pullman expert Arthur D. Dublin said in his Pullman Paint and Lettering Notebook on page 10:
|
|
locked
Re: original passenger car color
C J Wyatt
Thanks Matt,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I had heard the UPS story and that took place in 1916. Dublin said that Pullman started developing its green in 1900. Maybe it took ten years to evolve. Brown sounds good to me. Now if I can get some evidence for the lettering. Jack
On Thursday, September 24, 2020, 08:21:35 PM EDT, Matt Bumgarner <tarheelpress@...> wrote:
At the SE Narrow Gauge & Shortline Museum, we have been restoring an 1899 narrow gauge baggage car from the WV Midland Rwy. We found the original specs from the Jackson & Sharpe records, and the color specified was "Pullman", but as we sanded down siding or removed moulding, all we found was a chocolate brown. After more research, we found out indeed that the early "Pullman" color was brown, and around 1910 changed to green. I can't remember the source, but I remember reading that UPS picked their brown color to match the original "Pullman" brown. Matt Bumgrner On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:57 PM C J Wyatt <cjwyatt@...> wrote: I assumed that the Southern Railway System's first passenger car color was similar to Pullman Green. Indeed, in a contract dated May 3, 1895 with Pullman Palace Car Company for new passenger cars, the body color is specified as "Pullman Standard furnished by Sherwin Williams Co". However the "standard" may be something else. Pullman expert Arthur D. Dublin said in his Pullman Paint and Lettering Notebook on page 10:
|
|