|
locked
Re: Materials from the SRHA Archives
Matt and Ike:
A few random thoughts, below.
—Bill
Rather than add it to the membership fee, I think it would be more productive - and avoid the risk of pricing our membership out of the range of
Matt and Ike:
A few random thoughts, below.
—Bill
Rather than add it to the membership fee, I think it would be more productive - and avoid the risk of pricing our membership out of the range of
|
By
Bill Schafer
·
#1090
·
|
|
locked
Re: Materials from the SRHA Archives
Matt:
First of all, thank you for your response! As a publisher, you have a solid background in the subject….
My comments below follow yours with ****
Matt:
First of all, thank you for your response! As a publisher, you have a solid background in the subject….
My comments below follow yours with ****
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1089
·
|
|
locked
Re: Materials from the SRHA Archives
Here's my 2 cents worth:
A. Should SRHA simply understand that archives and library material should be free to anyone?
No. I am not a board member, but I would think that other than magazine
Here's my 2 cents worth:
A. Should SRHA simply understand that archives and library material should be free to anyone?
No. I am not a board member, but I would think that other than magazine
|
By
Matt Bumgarner
·
#1088
·
|
|
locked
Materials from the SRHA Archives
Posted to both the SouthernRailway and SRS.io groups.
I will post a higher resolution version of the horse car scan shortly. The stencil has several really interesting aspects folks may want to
Posted to both the SouthernRailway and SRS.io groups.
I will post a higher resolution version of the horse car scan shortly. The stencil has several really interesting aspects folks may want to
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1087
·
|
|
locked
Re: structures--specifically "section dwellings" -- how were they used?
The SRHA archives contain several versions of Section Foremans’ and Laborers’ houses. The designs changed over the years and do not appear to have been standardized across the SRS. Many were sold
The SRHA archives contain several versions of Section Foremans’ and Laborers’ houses. The designs changed over the years and do not appear to have been standardized across the SRS. Many were sold
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1086
·
|
|
locked
Re: structures--specifically "section dwellings" -- how were they used?
The property was divided in MOW territories called sections, usually 10-12 miles. The MOW forces were housed in company houses to ensure their availability to being called out. The 4-room house is
The property was divided in MOW territories called sections, usually 10-12 miles. The MOW forces were housed in company houses to ensure their availability to being called out. The 4-room house is
|
By
Carl Ardrey
·
#1085
·
|
|
locked
structures--specifically "section dwellings" -- how were they used?
Hi all,
Can anyone help me?
I have been having fun searching through and understanding materials I have collected from the ICC valuation documents at the National Archives. I live much closer to them
Hi all,
Can anyone help me?
I have been having fun searching through and understanding materials I have collected from the ICC valuation documents at the National Archives. I live much closer to them
|
By
A&Y Dave in MD
·
#1083
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Fenton,
I checked and found I have a couple of the LifeLike SOU 50 ft doubledoor end door equipped auto boxcars. As you have been assisting with questions on the suitability of these cars as accurate
Fenton,
I checked and found I have a couple of the LifeLike SOU 50 ft doubledoor end door equipped auto boxcars. As you have been assisting with questions on the suitability of these cars as accurate
|
By
Robert Graham
·
#1081
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Ike, the link leads to an email to be sent. what is the link to the subgroup.
Ike, the link leads to an email to be sent. what is the link to the subgroup.
|
By
Byron Osborn
·
#1080
·
|
|
locked
Re: ModelingTheSouthern group
Brian:
Thanks! That URL to join has eluded me….Thanks again!
Ike
Brian:
Thanks! That URL to join has eluded me….Thanks again!
Ike
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1079
·
|
|
locked
Re: ModelingTheSouthern group
Thanks Brian. That did it. :)
Tim Rumph
Lancaster, SC
Thanks Brian. That did it. :)
Tim Rumph
Lancaster, SC
|
By
Tim
·
#1078
·
|
|
locked
Re: ModelingTheSouthern group
Tim
Try https://southernrailway.groups.io/g/ModelingTheSouthern
Brian
From: "main@SouthernRailway.groups.io" <main@SouthernRailway.groups.io> on behalf of Tim <tarumph@...>
Reply-To:
Tim
Try https://southernrailway.groups.io/g/ModelingTheSouthern
Brian
From: "main@SouthernRailway.groups.io" <main@SouthernRailway.groups.io> on behalf of Tim <tarumph@...>
Reply-To:
|
By
Brian Clark
·
#1077
·
|
|
locked
ModelingTheSouthern group
Ike referred me to the ModelingTheSouthern@... for modeling topics on our favorite railroad. I sent a message to that address, but got a delivery failure, "Address not found."
I prefer to use these
Ike referred me to the ModelingTheSouthern@... for modeling topics on our favorite railroad. I sent a message to that address, but got a delivery failure, "Address not found."
I prefer to use these
|
By
Tim
·
#1076
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Tim:
Quite true, “ModelingTheSouthern@groups.io” is a subgroup. I don’t like the .io set-up as the subgroup is not obvious. You have to join them separately.
I am both a modeler and a
Tim:
Quite true, “ModelingTheSouthern@groups.io” is a subgroup. I don’t like the .io set-up as the subgroup is not obvious. You have to join them separately.
I am both a modeler and a
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1075
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Is there a seperate modeling group here on groups.io? The title of this group, if you look at the Home page is:
Southern Railway Historical and Modeling Information Interchange
Tim Rumph
Lancaster, SC
Is there a seperate modeling group here on groups.io? The title of this group, if you look at the Home page is:
Southern Railway Historical and Modeling Information Interchange
Tim Rumph
Lancaster, SC
|
By
Tim
·
#1074
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Could we try to direct modeling questions, comments and answers to the "ModelingTheSouthern" group? I responded on that group rather than here on the "prototype" SR group.
Ike
Could we try to direct modeling questions, comments and answers to the "ModelingTheSouthern" group? I responded on that group rather than here on the "prototype" SR group.
Ike
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1073
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Are these the P2K kits? The first SR 50 ft DD boxcars were 10'-0" IH and you have to kit bash these. Theo others can be made with the P2K kit see attached chart.
Also attached is a photo of 2 50
Are these the P2K kits? The first SR 50 ft DD boxcars were 10'-0" IH and you have to kit bash these. Theo others can be made with the P2K kit see attached chart.
Also attached is a photo of 2 50
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#1072
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
I have two of the 50' Automobile Box Car kits SOU 42010 and 42022. I don't know if they are accurate, but this is what the instructions say: "For this prototype, four roads had straight side sills
I have two of the 50' Automobile Box Car kits SOU 42010 and 42022. I don't know if they are accurate, but this is what the instructions say: "For this prototype, four roads had straight side sills
|
By
Ken Vandevoort <apo09324@...>
·
#1071
·
|
|
locked
Re: Industries between Morristown and Asheville.
Great news. I haven't been there since the 1960's.
Great news. I haven't been there since the 1960's.
|
By
George Courtney
·
#1070
·
|
|
locked
Re: Proto2000 Southern Boxcars
Don't know I don't have any
Fenton
--
Fenton Wells
250 Frye Rd
Pinehurst NC 28374
910-420-8106
srrfan1401@...
Don't know I don't have any
Fenton
--
Fenton Wells
250 Frye Rd
Pinehurst NC 28374
910-420-8106
srrfan1401@...
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#1069
·
|