|
Re: Southern Railway Books
Sounds like a reasonable approach and I would hope to purchase. What wheel arrangement do expect to lead off with? You could go with the one which has the most general appeal outside of the Southern
Sounds like a reasonable approach and I would hope to purchase. What wheel arrangement do expect to lead off with? You could go with the one which has the most general appeal outside of the Southern
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#3086
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
I think I would definitely support this project by purchasing the books.
I think I would definitely support this project by purchasing the books.
|
By
Will Kesler
·
#3085
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
In an effort to stir the pot and drum up a little discussion, let’s talk about a steam book series. SRHA has a project in the works, and it hit the front burner this weekend. That means we’re
In an effort to stir the pot and drum up a little discussion, let’s talk about a steam book series. SRHA has a project in the works, and it hit the front burner this weekend. That means we’re
|
By
Kevin Centers
·
#3084
·
|
|
Saluda Summer
There is a silent film of action on the Saluda grade that can be found on YouTube right here, https://youtu.be/3XyAHXJNYhc
Sadly it is a VHS copy of the film. Does anyone know if the original film
There is a silent film of action on the Saluda grade that can be found on YouTube right here, https://youtu.be/3XyAHXJNYhc
Sadly it is a VHS copy of the film. Does anyone know if the original film
|
By
Will Kesler
·
#3083
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
Simply as info. Presently there are 3,272 Southern steam loco scans, 141 memos, and 1,424 steam loco drawings in the archives. It’s not really possible to estimate how many more there are of those
Simply as info. Presently there are 3,272 Southern steam loco scans, 141 memos, and 1,424 steam loco drawings in the archives. It’s not really possible to estimate how many more there are of those
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#3082
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
All:
Donnie has a good point but it’s important to note, the copyright/right to publish of most of the photos in the SRHA archives are held by SRHA.
Getting anything published takes, manpower to
All:
Donnie has a good point but it’s important to note, the copyright/right to publish of most of the photos in the SRHA archives are held by SRHA.
Getting anything published takes, manpower to
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#3081
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
I thank you for your comments, it is obvious I do not know very much about how things are done with books to publish things so I am sorry for that. I will however keep searching for photos as a hobbie
I thank you for your comments, it is obvious I do not know very much about how things are done with books to publish things so I am sorry for that. I will however keep searching for photos as a hobbie
|
By
Will Kesler
·
#3080
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books beating the dead horse
A few weeks back, I posted that a Prince book was for sale on eBay.
No doubt someone MUST have bought it. Anyone bid? (that might indicate interest)
The Prince book does
A few weeks back, I posted that a Prince book was for sale on eBay.
No doubt someone MUST have bought it. Anyone bid? (that might indicate interest)
The Prince book does
|
By
milepost 131
·
#3079
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
Will, I can appreciate your request. I would remind you of a few things I’ve learned.
1. There are two major but out-of-print photo books on Southern steam—Prince’s and the Ranks & Lowe books
Will, I can appreciate your request. I would remind you of a few things I’ve learned.
1. There are two major but out-of-print photo books on Southern steam—Prince’s and the Ranks & Lowe books
|
By
A&Y Dave in MD
·
#3078
·
|
|
Re: Southern Railway Books
Just a small point of order. COPYRIGHT may just need to be considered. Officially, one cannot just compile a bunch of photos and put them into a book without the permission of the originator. Of
Just a small point of order. COPYRIGHT may just need to be considered. Officially, one cannot just compile a bunch of photos and put them into a book without the permission of the originator. Of
|
By
Donnie Dixon
·
#3077
·
|
|
Southern Railway Books
I recall that there was discussion about a Southern Railway book to potentially be made. I do not know if this will indeed come to be true, but I would like to ask if there would be anyway to make a
I recall that there was discussion about a Southern Railway book to potentially be made. I do not know if this will indeed come to be true, but I would like to ask if there would be anyway to make a
|
By
Will Kesler
·
#3076
·
|
|
moderated
Train show reminder THIS weekend January 21-22; Richmond, Va.
Just that last minute little reminder of the next train show coming up THIS weekend; Richmond, Virginia on the weekend of January 21-22, 2023; Saturday and Sunday. It will be located in the Richmond
Just that last minute little reminder of the next train show coming up THIS weekend; Richmond, Virginia on the weekend of January 21-22, 2023; Saturday and Sunday. It will be located in the Richmond
|
By
Cohen Bob
·
#3075
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
The branch line from Belton, SC to Walhalla, SC, crossing the Wash-Atl mainline in Seneca, SC, was designated the Z line. Originally the Blue Ridge Railway and predating the actual Southern Railway,
The branch line from Belton, SC to Walhalla, SC, crossing the Wash-Atl mainline in Seneca, SC, was designated the Z line. Originally the Blue Ridge Railway and predating the actual Southern Railway,
|
By
mike turner
·
#3074
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
In the 1974 Carolina Division ETT, the Carolina and Northwestern main line from York, SC to Lenoir, NC (included Newton, Conover, and Hickory on the S-Line) did not have a letter designation. Later
In the 1974 Carolina Division ETT, the Carolina and Northwestern main line from York, SC to Lenoir, NC (included Newton, Conover, and Hickory on the S-Line) did not have a letter designation. Later
|
By
Tim
·
#3073
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
Thanks for the pointer to that 1912 list; that's very interesting and helpful. But I still can't really discern a pattern to the letter designations. For example, B was the Harrisonburg Branch but C
Thanks for the pointer to that 1912 list; that's very interesting and helpful. But I still can't really discern a pattern to the letter designations. For example, B was the Harrisonburg Branch but C
|
By
Tracey Green
·
#3072
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
The 1912 Station list for all the Southern at that time includes letters representing lines in the station number column. Junctions have multiple station numbers, e.g., Greensboro has 3 numbers, K-0,
The 1912 Station list for all the Southern at that time includes letters representing lines in the station number column. Junctions have multiple station numbers, e.g., Greensboro has 3 numbers, K-0,
|
By
A&Y Dave in MD
·
#3071
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
All the CofG mileposts are from Savannah with a letter prefix designating the line. The former ETV&G lines used a letter suffix.
CEA
All the CofG mileposts are from Savannah with a letter prefix designating the line. The former ETV&G lines used a letter suffix.
CEA
|
By
Carl Ardrey
·
#3070
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
There also at one time was an R line in I think the Danville Division and there is one on the Piedmont Division today
There also at one time was an R line in I think the Danville Division and there is one on the Piedmont Division today
|
By
Tracey Green
·
#3069
·
|
|
moderated
Re: Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
At some point the letter system became division dependent. There is a C-line on just about every division and many of the timetables as an example. Does anyone know when that came into play? Maybe the
At some point the letter system became division dependent. There is a C-line on just about every division and many of the timetables as an example. Does anyone know when that came into play? Maybe the
|
By
Jason Greene
·
#3068
·
|
|
moderated
Branch Line Designations - it's actually VERY simple, and I mean VERY simple
I'll stand corrected on this one but somewhere around the turn o the 19th to the 20th century, the newly created Southern Railway came up with a "numbering system" for branchlines.
The plan was
I'll stand corrected on this one but somewhere around the turn o the 19th to the 20th century, the newly created Southern Railway came up with a "numbering system" for branchlines.
The plan was
|
By
Cohen Bob
·
#3067
·
|