|
locked
Southern Vs EMD
I have mentioned how the Southern was not averse to letting car and loco builders “have it” when they were unhappy about something. Here is an example from the SRHA archives.
If we can presume
I have mentioned how the Southern was not averse to letting car and loco builders “have it” when they were unhappy about something. Here is an example from the SRHA archives.
If we can presume
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#2225
·
|
|
locked
Re: Early Diesel switcher assignments
The part about coupler blocks and mainline use is a very important issue. Locally, we had an MP15 being moved back to the maintenance shop dead in transit, and the local yard forgot to put in the
The part about coupler blocks and mainline use is a very important issue. Locally, we had an MP15 being moved back to the maintenance shop dead in transit, and the local yard forgot to put in the
|
By
Curt Fortenberry
·
#2224
·
|
|
locked
Re: Preserved Southern Switchers?
Monticello Rwy Museum in Monticello has an NS slug that was made from a Southern RS-3.
Matt Bumgarner
Monticello Rwy Museum in Monticello has an NS slug that was made from a Southern RS-3.
Matt Bumgarner
|
By
Matt Bumgarner
·
#2223
·
|
|
locked
Re: Early Diesel switcher assignments
Great stuff, Don….thanks!
SRHA has most, maybe all (?) of the Specifications for Southern’s diesels. Three, four or five “Specification Supplements” were common as negotiations proceeded with
Great stuff, Don….thanks!
SRHA has most, maybe all (?) of the Specifications for Southern’s diesels. Three, four or five “Specification Supplements” were common as negotiations proceeded with
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#2222
·
|
|
locked
Re: Early Diesel switcher assignments
My recollections of SW1500s is somewhat different. I recall their speed was restricted in that their ability to make transition was not nearly as advanced as mainline locomotives and speed
My recollections of SW1500s is somewhat different. I recall their speed was restricted in that their ability to make transition was not nearly as advanced as mainline locomotives and speed
|
By
Don Usak
·
#2221
·
|
|
locked
Re: Preserved Southern Switchers?
I forgot to add the SW-1 at Wadley in the woods. Privately owned. It is ex-G&F and Southern.
Jason Greene
I forgot to add the SW-1 at Wadley in the woods. Privately owned. It is ex-G&F and Southern.
Jason Greene
|
By
Jason Greene
·
#2220
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
I agree, it is a bit confusing for newcomers and the old yahoo links on http://www.srha.net/public/resources/links.asp need updating as well. If needed, here are links that work for me for anyone out
I agree, it is a bit confusing for newcomers and the old yahoo links on http://www.srha.net/public/resources/links.asp need updating as well. If needed, here are links that work for me for anyone out
|
By
Preston Clark
·
#2219
·
|
|
locked
Re: Preserved Southern Switchers?
8202 at SRM is certainly one.
Three Rivers Rambler/Clausen have two SW-1s at Knoxville.
There is a SW-1 at Oakridge I believe.
To my knowledge no ALCO or Baldwins were saved. No SW-1500 have been
8202 at SRM is certainly one.
Three Rivers Rambler/Clausen have two SW-1s at Knoxville.
There is a SW-1 at Oakridge I believe.
To my knowledge no ALCO or Baldwins were saved. No SW-1500 have been
|
By
Jason Greene
·
#2218
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
My problem was finding the sub-group. Missing it was my fault. However the SRHA 'links' page needs some cleaning up to get rid of defunct Yahoo groups. Perhaps as that is done, a link to the modeling
My problem was finding the sub-group. Missing it was my fault. However the SRHA 'links' page needs some cleaning up to get rid of defunct Yahoo groups. Perhaps as that is done, a link to the modeling
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2217
·
|
|
locked
Re: Preserved Southern Switchers?
Bob,
Currently we at SRM are getting close to having 8202 operational again. We had the Traction Motors and wheels overhauled, are restoring the cab, and painting the trucks. Still a ways to go,
Bob,
Currently we at SRM are getting close to having 8202 operational again. We had the Traction Motors and wheels overhauled, are restoring the cab, and painting the trucks. Still a ways to go,
|
By
Stephen Warner
·
#2216
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
Gentlemen:
I don’t think any “clarification” is necessary, just read the home pages of the SouthernRailway.io and ModelingtheSouthern.io home
Gentlemen:
I don’t think any “clarification” is necessary, just read the home pages of the SouthernRailway.io and ModelingtheSouthern.io home
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#2215
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
I see what I missed. On the main group homepage, the menu down the left side has an entry for 'subgroup'.
Jack
I see what I missed. On the main group homepage, the menu down the left side has an entry for 'subgroup'.
Jack
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2214
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
James, appreciate it. You've got it. I guess I declined to join it when the sub-group talk first came up.
Jack
James, appreciate it. You've got it. I guess I declined to join it when the sub-group talk first came up.
Jack
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2213
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
Found the link: https://southernrailway.groups.io/g/ModelingTheSouthern
Found the link: https://southernrailway.groups.io/g/ModelingTheSouthern
|
By
James Walton
·
#2212
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
Simple. Go to your groups on GROUPS.IO, find the SouthernRailway group and the modeling group should show up under it
Richard Morris
Simple. Go to your groups on GROUPS.IO, find the SouthernRailway group and the modeling group should show up under it
Richard Morris
|
By
Richard
·
#2211
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
James, I looked myself and I think you are correct. Interestingly though, it is not affiliated with SRHA. This site (SRHA's) says it is for history and modeling, so we need some clarification of
James, I looked myself and I think you are correct. Interestingly though, it is not affiliated with SRHA. This site (SRHA's) says it is for history and modeling, so we need some clarification of
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2210
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
I went on groups.io and found this group listed - it seems this is the group focused on both historical and modelling topics.
I went on groups.io and found this group listed - it seems this is the group focused on both historical and modelling topics.
|
By
James Walton
·
#2209
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
No need for apologies. There is another Southern Railway group not affiliated with SRHA which discusses both history and modeling. It seems like the home page of this group should have a link to the
No need for apologies. There is another Southern Railway group not affiliated with SRHA which discusses both history and modeling. It seems like the home page of this group should have a link to the
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2208
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
My apologies, I misread your post, thinking you were asking how we found this group.
I might recommend going on the groups.io website and searching for a group there.
My apologies, I misread your post, thinking you were asking how we found this group.
I might recommend going on the groups.io website and searching for a group there.
|
By
James Walton
·
#2207
·
|
|
locked
Re: Locos and Traffic on the Atlanta-Birmingham Line
James, I am glad that you gave it a try. However, this is the main group which is supposedly reserved for history with modeling going on a subgroup, but how do you access the subgroup?
Jack
James, I am glad that you gave it a try. However, this is the main group which is supposedly reserved for history with modeling going on a subgroup, but how do you access the subgroup?
Jack
|
By
C J Wyatt
·
#2206
·
|