|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
This was posted by Ron Stafford in the Appalachian Rails and Mining Facebook group. It is from March 1963.
Scott, noticed your photos show some of the Middlesboro District mines. It caught my
This was posted by Ron Stafford in the Appalachian Rails and Mining Facebook group. It is from March 1963.
Scott, noticed your photos show some of the Middlesboro District mines. It caught my
|
By
Evan Miller
·
#1595
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
> Just to confirm this is from Oct 1984?
Yes.
Scott Chatfield
> Just to confirm this is from Oct 1984?
Yes.
Scott Chatfield
|
By
D. Scott Chatfield
·
#1594
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
Scott,
Thank you so much! Just to confirm this is from Oct 1984?
Dan
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Scott,
Thank you so much! Just to confirm this is from Oct 1984?
Dan
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
|
By
Daniel Bourque
·
#1593
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
I guess my phone doesn't want to upload directly to this list's file section on groups.io, so I'll just attach the images to this email.
Scott Chatfield
I guess my phone doesn't want to upload directly to this list's file section on groups.io, so I'll just attach the images to this email.
Scott Chatfield
|
By
D. Scott Chatfield
·
#1592
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
Dan:
I don’t expect the Southern would know much about inter-company sales. There could be something on the waybills relating to that but they have not survived anywhere I have seen.
Ike
PS!!! Does
Dan:
I don’t expect the Southern would know much about inter-company sales. There could be something on the waybills relating to that but they have not survived anywhere I have seen.
Ike
PS!!! Does
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1591
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
Ike,
Thank you for that list! It’ll definitely help narrow down a few of the loaders—now I need to figure out which coal companies sold to which other companies so I can match up tipples.
Ike,
Thank you for that list! It’ll definitely help narrow down a few of the loaders—now I need to figure out which coal companies sold to which other companies so I can match up tipples.
|
By
Daniel Bourque
·
#1590
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
Here is one page from a report listing many/all(?) active coal mines on the Southern in 1974. It covers both the St. Charles line on the Appalachia Div. and the Interstate.
There are many files
Here is one page from a report listing many/all(?) active coal mines on the Southern in 1974. It covers both the St. Charles line on the Appalachia Div. and the Interstate.
There are many files
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1589
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
In the Archives we have a map printed by the Southern of active coal loadouts in October 1984. Of course it includes the Southern and Interstate lines in southwest Virginia. I took quick pics of the
In the Archives we have a map printed by the Southern of active coal loadouts in October 1984. Of course it includes the Southern and Interstate lines in southwest Virginia. I took quick pics of the
|
By
D. Scott Chatfield
·
#1588
·
|
|
locked
Re: St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
I too would be interested in that information, Dan. Be glad to help you with compiling it as well.
--
Paul Schmidt
Sequim WA
I too would be interested in that information, Dan. Be glad to help you with compiling it as well.
--
Paul Schmidt
Sequim WA
|
By
pschmidt3013@...
·
#1587
·
|
|
locked
St Charles Branch Coal Loader Info
Hi Everyone,
I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I really appreciate how much incredibly knowledge resides here—thanks for sharing!
I’m hoping there might be a Southern coal
Hi Everyone,
I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I really appreciate how much incredibly knowledge resides here—thanks for sharing!
I’m hoping there might be a Southern coal
|
By
Daniel Bourque
·
#1586
·
|
|
locked
Re: Southern Pullman passenger daily average 2-15-66
Lines 6857 and 6856 connected at Greensboro
Line 2609 connected at Charlotte
Line 2254 connected at Harriman
Bob Grabarek
Lines 6857 and 6856 connected at Greensboro
Line 2609 connected at Charlotte
Line 2254 connected at Harriman
Bob Grabarek
|
By
Robert W. Grabarek, Jr.
·
#1585
·
|
|
locked
Re: Southern Pullman passenger daily average 2-15-66
Sorry, poorly worded question. The train numbers are on the list...when cars connected to different trains, where did that occur?
Ike
Sorry, poorly worded question. The train numbers are on the list...when cars connected to different trains, where did that occur?
Ike
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1584
·
|
|
locked
Southern Pullman passenger daily average 2-15-66
By 1966, the Southern wanted to discontinue most passenger services. The passenger "numbers" of all trains were closely watched and used for train-off petitions to the ICC and state PUCs. Here are two
By 1966, the Southern wanted to discontinue most passenger services. The passenger "numbers" of all trains were closely watched and used for train-off petitions to the ICC and state PUCs. Here are two
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1583
·
|
|
locked
New .io group prices
I just saw a message explaining how .io group prices are going up.
As the Southern Railway group is well above the 200 subscriber list to remain a basic (sic free) service, it is grandfathered in but
I just saw a message explaining how .io group prices are going up.
As the Southern Railway group is well above the 200 subscriber list to remain a basic (sic free) service, it is grandfathered in but
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1582
·
|
|
locked
Central of Georgia Engine Repaint
Hello, list.
Does anyone know when the Southern finished repainting the Central of Georgia engines into the tuxedo scheme with CG lettering?
Regards,
Tom Holley
Hello, list.
Does anyone know when the Southern finished repainting the Central of Georgia engines into the tuxedo scheme with CG lettering?
Regards,
Tom Holley
|
By
Tom Holley
·
#1581
·
|
|
locked
Charlotte Rapid Transit Co. 1912
I expect it would be safe to say; the attached letter from the Charlotte Rapid Transit Co. has been sitting untouched in the Southern Railway Presidents' files since it was written in 1912. I think I
I expect it would be safe to say; the attached letter from the Charlotte Rapid Transit Co. has been sitting untouched in the Southern Railway Presidents' files since it was written in 1912. I think I
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1580
·
|
|
locked
Re: Steel vs wood passenger cars Circa 1909
That is interesting. Thanks for sharing stuff on the early years. I get the whole high hoods era attraction, but for some reason I'm just fascinated in the 1900-1940 era. I'm reading a 1928 Car
That is interesting. Thanks for sharing stuff on the early years. I get the whole high hoods era attraction, but for some reason I'm just fascinated in the 1900-1940 era. I'm reading a 1928 Car
|
By
A&Y Dave in MD
·
#1579
·
|
|
locked
Re: Chip Car
Tom:
Those (converted wood rack) chip cars were discussed in a TIES article years ago. Maybe someone (Bill Schafer) can tell us which issue?
Ike
PS They never would have traveled to Columbus, GA.
Tom:
Those (converted wood rack) chip cars were discussed in a TIES article years ago. Maybe someone (Bill Schafer) can tell us which issue?
Ike
PS They never would have traveled to Columbus, GA.
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1578
·
|
|
locked
Re: Whale Oil and Southern Railway shipment information in the Fairfax Harrison period
Chris:
Remember, prior to WWII the Southern was basically an East-West railroad (note the 1921 v 1931 traffic map). A Southern route from Norfolk to Ivorydale (Cincy), OH would have been the most
Chris:
Remember, prior to WWII the Southern was basically an East-West railroad (note the 1921 v 1931 traffic map). A Southern route from Norfolk to Ivorydale (Cincy), OH would have been the most
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1577
·
|
|
locked
Re: Steel vs wood passenger cars Circa 1909
Note attached....By June of 1911, attitudes on all-steel cars had changed but the Pullman Co. could not supply enough steel cars. The Southern considered the "Birmingham Special" a first-class train,
Note attached....By June of 1911, attitudes on all-steel cars had changed but the Pullman Co. could not supply enough steel cars. The Southern considered the "Birmingham Special" a first-class train,
|
By
George Eichelberger
·
#1576
·
|