Date
1 - 1 of 1
Locked [ModelingTheSouthern] Southern 70T Woodchip Hopper
George Eichelberger
Dan:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Here is a reduced size SF-21598 showing the bracing that sat inside the box car wood chip conversions. You’ll understand my reference to looking like a child’s swing set. (I’ll look to see if Southern did something similar for the hopper conversions?) I’ve attached a rather poor scan made from microfilm years ago. We just put the new 48” scanner in service in the archives and I spent this past Thurs-Sat scanning the full size drawings…there are thousands more to do!. (We spent $7,000 on the new scanner but it’s worth every cent as far as we are concerned…of course donations to the archives are always welcome!) With more help at the work sessions, we can get more done and work to make copies available, more to TIES articles, etc., etc. The Nov. session dates will be the 3rd weekend (Fri & Sat) of the month. I mentioned we will be starting the “Southern News Bulletin” email to SRHA members every month TIES is not published next year. It’s not a PDF version of TIES as it will include modeling articles, “the Southern Today”, “From the Archives”, etc. We are looking for SRHA member volunteers to edit different sections, send a note to archives@... if you are interested. (A formal announcement will come out shortly.) Not every section will be in every “issue” and we expect it will only be a few pages to start. How it grows is “TBD”. Ike On Oct 17, 2021, at 11:04 AM, Daniel Bourque <deltabourque@...> wrote:
Ike, Fenton, David,
Good info on the shakers! I didn’t have any photos of the inside, so the cross bracing was a guess based on the extra panels on the outside reinforcing this section of the car as well as the example of bracing used in the modified boxcars. I’m making a
removable load from foamcore that has slots to accommodate the bracing.
The “rust” on the sides is just some paint stippling with a mostly dry brush.
Dan
On Oct 17, 2021, at 7:35 AM, George Eichelberger <geichelberger@...> wrote:
|
|